Albee in China: Revisit The Goat, or Who is Sylvia?

Abstract

This article offers a critical examination of Edward Albee’s “The Goat, or Who is Sylvia?” in response to Professor Lianqiao Zhang’s interpretations. Challenging conventional readings that perceive the play as a manifestation of ethical concerns, it argues these interpretations, especially Zhang’s, are anthropocentric and overly simplistic. The play, known for its controversial exploration of human-animal relationships, is reinterpreted here as a platform for discussing broader themes like queer sexualities, marginalization, and societal norms. The article critiques the anthropocentric perspective prevalent in academic discourse, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of the play’s symbolic elements, particularly the goat’s representation. It aligns with post-humanist perspectives and underscores the play’s performative nature, emphasizing its role in challenging and transforming audience perceptions. “The Goat” is presented not just as a moral discourse but as a medium for profound existential and societal reflection, echoing Albee’s intent to provoke thought rather than dictate moral judgments. This reevaluation contributes to a deeper appreciation of the play’s complexities and its enduring relevance in modern literature and society.